We should work to integrate with eclipse's rich client platform certainly. I would be doing this now myself if I built apps with Eclipse for a living. Currently, however, I and my customers prefer Swing solutions at this point, and Spring Rich adds a lot of value there.
I think what we've focused on in spring rich thus far is not reinvention, but innovation, and innovation that builds on standard Swing, not JFace/AWT. Swing needs simplification through appropriate, higher-level OO abstractions, and needs it bad. And many people still view Swing as "the" widget toolkit to build platform independent desktop apps in Java.
To date we've done a lot of cool things integrating Spring's IoC container into a Swing-app environment. The result? It's a lot easier to write a clean, concisely coded (and well-layered) swing app, where it was quite easy to write ugly, lengthy coded one before.
I should point out a good many of the issues we're addressing in rich client, for example: data validation, UI-to-domain model binding, and command/request workflow aren't really addressed by Eclipse's base RCP platform, anyway. There is a definite "enterprise/j2ee app" focus in spring rich client.
With all this said I definitely would LOVE to see Eclipse RCP integration on top of Spring, leveraging existing complimentary libraries of spring rich (such as the data binding stuff). But I wouldn't want to force spring rich users to HAVE to use eclipse's platform: in many cases it's just not necessary (particularly when a team already knows Swing, cares about platform independence, and doesn't want the complexity of the eclipse plugin model - yet another thing to configure...)
Keith
Keith Donald
Core Spring Development Team