roo-1.1.0M2 + GWT + GAE + Set = cannot find symbol : class SetRecord

[koma]

Hi,

I had the same problem; When you have a oneToMany relation then the child member attribute is probably a set.
suppose you have Invoice -> InvoiceDetails; Then replace everywhere in the generated code "SetRecord" with "InvoiceDetailRecord" and you're set. Apparently a bug.

rgds,
K.

[Eliseo]

There's already a bug report for this, please upvote it!

https://jira.springframework.org/browse/ROO-1070

[tuliopa]

I think there are problem to create a class for Set and HashSet, I create a project to see the diferents between Roo 1.0.2 vs 1.1.0M2, and the relations that use Set has no created by gwt after the run of the command "gwt setup"
name.tuliopa.gwt.request.SetRecord cannot be resolved.

[rbuckland]

As you've determined, Roo 1.1.0.M1 is using GWT 2.1.0.M1 features which are very early stage as far as request factory goes. This means many common primitives and collections are currently unsupported. Don't worry, it's a priority for GWT 2.1.0.M2 and Roo 1.1.0.M1 - both expected towards the end of June. The M1 releases were to show you where we're heading, and to resolve many of the important issues required to run GWT apps (like GAE support, Maven support, POM setup etc). Please bear with us. It will be worth it! :-)

Hi Ben,

Long time no see.

has there been any update on the Set support for gwt setup ? do you think it will be in the forthcoming M3 release ?

Another on this thread mentioned that it is just a build issue, and that the GWT framework is supporting it. (Perhaps a question for Ray .. ) Is there an example of it working, all be it static ? Would love to get cracking on a Roo/Gwt app, GWT being what I always use these days and Roo just seems to fit well.

cheers
Ramon (ex Sydney)

[fbrody]

Hi Ben,

Same as rBuckland, I'd really like someone to pass any information about this issue onto the user community...

I'm using GWT 2.1.0.M2 and Roo 1.1.0.M2 and still experiencing the same issue

Is it fixed somewhere on some branch, that I could use...?

thanks in advance

f