@Value annotation mixed with property-placeholder

[npottrain]

Hi all,

I have the following problem.

we use contextroperty-placeholder to load two properties.
<contextroperty-placeholder location="classpathroject-default.properties,${projectConfPath}project-specific.properties"/>

The project-default.properties is part of the war file.
The project-specific.properties files is retrieved using as a prefix the system variable projectConfPath.
This enables to use the same war file and deploy it on various servers, overriding only the necessary properties (in project-specific.properties).

Now using Spring 3.0.1 I would like the same when using the @Value annotation. Unfortunately I only seem to find examples for loading a single properties file(using utilroperties).
Is it possible to use @Value annotation and load 2 properties where the latter overrules the first one?

Kind regards,

Nicolas

[tim.taylor]

Did you ever resolve this? I have exact same issue.

[scorpi77]

Guys,

I am struggling to get this working as well.

Please do let me know if you find the solution.

You can post your answer/solution to my question here: http://forum.springsource.org/showth...454#post297454

Thanks
scorpi77

[thomasvst]

How do you access the properties ?

I don't have any problem using :

@Value("${settings.some.property}")

(I'm using multiple locations in the PropertyPlaceholderConfigurer)

[opyate]

This question was answered a year before you asked it -- please search the forums before posting.

http://forum.springsource.org/showthread.php?t=69602

[scorpi77]

Hi opyate,

I hope you read the thread in detail before posting your reply.

I am trying to load multiple property files based on the enviroment. The thread link you posted in your reply doesnt provide the solution I am after.

See my original post here.

http://forum.springsource.org/showth...454#post297454

thanks.

[veenified]

This question was answered a year before you asked it -- please search the forums before posting.

http://forum.springsource.org/showthread.php?t=69602

Poor form opyate... if you would have read the OP's post you would see that they are trying to use it with the Placeholder Configurer.