Page 2 of 2 FirstFirst 12
Results 11 to 18 of 18

Thread: Has 1.0.0.GA been deployed to a Maven repository?

  1. #11
    Join Date
    Oct 2005
    Location
    Amsterdam
    Posts
    123

    Default

    Just to bump this one up one more time

    Has something come up that blocks the deployment of these artifacts? If so, please let me know so I can try solve this artifact issue some other way.

    Regards,
    Hans
    Hans Westerbeek
    Software Engineer

  2. #12
    Join Date
    Oct 2005
    Location
    Boston, MA
    Posts
    2,844

    Default

    Thanks for the bump

    I hope to have the artifacts published very soon - and will post back here.

  3. #13
    Join Date
    Dec 2008
    Posts
    3

    Default

    If there's a delay of posting these due to some technical reason and perhaps fear of publishing wrong jars/poms to central (because you can never change them there once published) is it perhaps possible to post them on some other spring specific repository? I specifically would like to see all the correct poms and jars that work together. Creating ones myself would be too painful of the process and will not match to what hopefully will be availalbe one day.

    Thanks.
    V.

  4. #14
    Join Date
    Oct 2005
    Location
    Boston, MA
    Posts
    2,844

    Default

    The artifacts were published earlier today and will therefore be available at some point within a few hours on repo1.maven.org.

    The JARs are always available in the SpringSource Enterprise Bundle Repository: http://www.springsource.com/repository

  5. #15
    Join Date
    Oct 2005
    Location
    Amsterdam
    Posts
    123

    Default

    thanks a bunch, that cleans up my poms considerably
    Hans Westerbeek
    Software Engineer

  6. #16
    Join Date
    Feb 2006
    Location
    Los Angeles, CA
    Posts
    79

    Smile

    Right on! Thanks for that!
    Josh Long
    Spring Developer Advocate
    SpringSource, a division of VMware

    http://blog.SpringSource.org
    http://www.joshlong.com

  7. #17
    Join Date
    Dec 2008
    Posts
    3

    Default

    yep. thank you. I wonder why you include the word 'RELEASE' in the version number. Seems superflous and all other spring components don't do that. But that's very minor, it works great for me.

    -V.

  8. #18
    Join Date
    Oct 2007
    Location
    London, England
    Posts
    108

    Default

    Release is there to be consistent with the versions used by Spring Integration in the SpringSource repository. This allows people who want to switch to simply modify the artifact id.
    SpringSource repository
    Code:
    <dependency>
      <groupId>org.springframework.integration</groupId>  
      <artifactId>org.springframework.integration.jms</artifactId>  
      <version>1.0.1.RELEASE</version> 
    </dependency>
    Repo 1
    Code:
    <dependency>
      <groupId>org.springframework.integration</groupId>
      <artifactId>spring-integration-jms</artifactId>
      <version>1.0.1.RELEASE</version>
    <dependency/>
    Glad to hear the pom's are working out for everyone.
    Jonas Partner
    OpenCredo

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •