Results 1 to 3 of 3

Thread: Spring Batch compared to Quartz

  1. #1

    Default Spring Batch compared to Quartz

    I've been trying to figure out, how Spring Batch compares to Quartz, but I haven't been able to find any answers...

    • Is Spring Batch supposed to be a replacement for Quartz (if so - what is wrong with Quartz)?
    • Is Spring Batch a supplement / add-on to Quartz (if so - what Quartz shortcommings are you addressing)?
    • Is Spring Batch a completely different kind of fish than Quartz (if so - what are the different kinds of use cases where you would use Quartz - and when would you use Spring Batch)?



  2. #2
    Join Date
    Nov 2004
    Location
    Hilversum - The Netherlands
    Posts
    1,054

    Default

    Spring Batch and Quartz have different goals. Spring Batch provides functionality for processing large volumes of data and Quartz provides functionality for scheduling tasks.

    So Quartz could complement Spring Batch... so certainly no excluding technologies.

  3. #3
    Join Date
    Aug 2007
    Posts
    8

    Default

    very true. quartz does not provide any batch processing framework. So far projects use their custom framework for batch and tie it up with quartz for scheduling.

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •