Results 1 to 5 of 5

Thread: Spring Framework 3.2.2 Released

Hybrid View

  1. #1
    Join Date
    May 2008
    Posts
    53

    Default Spring Framework 3.2.2 Released

    The second maintenance release in the Spring 3.2.x line is now available via Maven Central, the SpringSource repository, or for direct download from our community download page. This release includes over 100 bug fixes and improvements and is a recommended upgrade for all users.

    Download | Documentation | Javadoc | Changelog | JIRA | API changes from 3.2.1
    Phil Webb
    Spring Framework committer, VMware
    http://github.com/philwebb

  2. #2
    Join Date
    May 2013
    Location
    ATL, GA
    Posts
    1

    Default

    I've noted what I assume is a discrepancy with the release. I apologize if this is not the correct place to put this, but I was looking.

    The release notes list:

    "Changes in version 3.2.2 (2013-03-14)
    -------------------------------------
    * official support for Hibernate 4.2 (SPR-10255)"

    Which is great. I was tracking down some of the dependencies for our SCM team, and I wanted to verify which 4.2 was supported -- 4.2.0.Final, 4.2.2, etc.

    The issue is that the published POM doesn't list any 4.2 verison. The Spring Framework 3.2.2.RELEASE POM lists:

    <dependency><groupId>org.hibernate</groupId><artifactId>hibernate-core</artifactId><version>4.1.0.Final</version><scope>compile</scope><optional>true</optional></dependency>

    ( http://repo.springsource.org/release....2.RELEASE.pom )

    , which isn't much help. Similarly, the Spring Framework 3.2.3 release shows it depends on Hibernate-Core 4.1.9.Final.

    I did some sleuthing on my own, and found that maybe it's "org.hibernate:hibernate-core:4.2.1.Final"?

    See line 528: https://github.com/SpringSource/spring-framework/blob/master/build.gradle

    But really, what's the officially supported exact version for 3.2.3 and 3.2.2? Where would I find this as a consumer, and can someone fix the POMs published to the release repo site so we can be more confident we are using what you are using during development?

  3. #3
    Join Date
    May 2013
    Location
    new york
    Posts
    9

    Default

    Yes their is definitely something wrong with this version...someone might want to have a look into it. .
    Last edited by Millerwhite; May 31st, 2013 at 12:09 AM.

  4. #4
    Join Date
    Jun 2013
    Location
    New York
    Posts
    2

    Default

    no i don't think there anything wrong with the version its doing well everywhere.you can also see its latest version and also get some knowledge out of it.
    .

  5. #5
    Join Date
    Jun 2013
    Posts
    4

    Default

    hi............i am new to this forum.!!!!!!!!1

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •