Hi, within a Spring Batch project, I'm trying to use Spring Integration (2.0.5.RELEASE) to send a JMS message using the approach described in this blog post here:

http://gordondickens.com/wordpress/2...ate-in-spring/

My goal is to set the JMSReplyTo property so the receiver of the message knows where to send the response.
The queue manager is IBM WebsphereMQ. I'm getting the following error:

Code:
    2011-10-13 19:23:23,589 WARN  [o.s.i.j.DefaultJmsHeaderMapper:140] failed to map Message header 'JMSReplyTo' to JMS property
    javax.jms.MessageFormatException: MQJMS1058: Invalid message property name: JMSReplyTo
I was able to set the reply-to queue before using a plain JmsTemplate. Below is the approach I'm taking, outside of the error itself, I'm wondering if there's another way to configure the replyTo queue instead of the @Header approach below.

The interface I'm using looks like this;

Code:
public interface JmsGateway {
    @Gateway
    public void send(@Header("JMSReplyTo") String jmsReplyTo, String message);
}
If I set the value in the @Header annotation to anything that does not start with capital "JMS" (say 'jmsReplyTo'), the message gets thru fine and I can see the property.

In a Tasklet that has an JmsGateway, I am sending the message like so:

Code:
        jmsGateway.send("queue://MY.RESPONSE.QUEUE", message);
        // also tried: jmsGateway.send("MY.RESPONSE.QUEUE", message);
Below is the relevant Spring config:

Code:
    
    <si:channel id="requestChannel"/>
    <si:channel id="responseChannel"/>

    <si-jms:outbound-channel-adapter id="myAdapter" destination="requestQueue" channel="requestChannel" />

    <si:gateway id="jmsGateway"
                service-interface="org.mycompany.JmsGateway"
                default-request-channel="requestChannel"
                default-reply-channel="responseChannel"/>

    <bean id="requestQueue" class="com.ibm.mq.jms.MQQueue">
        <constructor-arg index="0" value="MY.REQUEST.QUEUE"/>
    </bean>
Any help would be greatly appreciated. I imagine I may not be trying to set the replyTo queue in the right place.
Thanks!