Results 1 to 2 of 2

Thread: Roo's ITDs don't mangle names, but mine do?

  1. May 6th, 2011, 09:36 PM #1
    matthewadams
    matthewadams is offline Senior Member
    Join Date
    Jul 2005
    Location
    Austin, TX
    Posts
    137

    Default Roo's ITDs don't mangle names, but mine do?

    Hi all,

    I've got a Roo project where I'm including my own aspects that introduce fields into my entities. Thing is, Roo's field ITDs don't have any name-mangling, but the ITDs I wrote are mangled.

    AspectJ 1.6.9 is the release that got rid of name mangling for private fields, which mine are. The Roo-generated pom.xml seems to be correct, declaring a dependency on AspectJ 1.6.11.

    So why are Roo's ITDs so special, and mine are so special ed?

    -matthew
    Reply With Quote Reply With Quote
  2. May 6th, 2011, 09:38 PM #2
    matthewadams
    matthewadams is offline Senior Member
    Join Date
    Jul 2005
    Location
    Austin, TX
    Posts
    137

    Default

    Ok, so I forgot that the fields are added directly to my entity and Roo generates the method ITDs. My bad.

    Still, with name mangling for private fields having gone away in AspectJ 1.6.9, why are my private field ITD names still being mangled?

    -matthew
    Reply With Quote Reply With Quote
« Previous Thread | Next Thread »

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •  

Forum Rules