It seems that spring data jdbc exentions <= 1.0.0.RC3 are not compatible with Spring 3.1.1
Type: Posts; User: chenrici; Keyword(s):
It seems that spring data jdbc exentions <= 1.0.0.RC3 are not compatible with Spring 3.1.1
Hi,
i am migrating from to the from the via springsource customer support provided Jdbc Oracle Extensions to the Open Source version.
My expectations where that i could replace the existing...
I have configured Spring Tomcat Loadtime Weaving according to the documentation for OpenJpa (... i think ;-) .
I get the following Log messages:
...
Great. Thanx seems like a good szenario....
Just to be sure.
That would mean that the library would create its own Applicationcontext with some code, like
final String path[] = {...
Absolutely ....;-)
Ok .... and here comes the analogy with log4j.properties .... although far fetched, i agree :-) ... but.....:
How would you proceed if your library supports different usage...
This is probably a silly question in most spring minded minds ;-) , but something i only recently came upon:
I have a libary, which is (re-)used by applications as jar.
The implementation...
In Springs Documentation i read the following:
"Spring JPA allows a configured JpaTransactionManager to expose a JPA transaction to JDBC access code that accesses the same JDBC DataSource,...
Thanx alot.
I guess it would be some light-weight remoting then.
Your right...
no, not the same Webapp (war).
Two different webapps.
I guess that's the important point.
Thanx.
Do they have the same ServletContext? No.
Hi,
i have two servlets, say A and B.
And i would like to reuse the Spring Configured Beans from the Servlet B in A.
Both are running in the same Container.
Is this possible at all?
Any...
Sorry, sorry.... just forget / ignore what i have posted here:
Coding mistakes, are coding mistakes.
And Java is still Java, even with RemoteExporters.
Naturally the Exception was Uncaught.
Further information (also see the Exception Stack, below):
The Runtime Exception ReferenceDataException is passed to the invoking
Client using in this the...
Something i don't understand:
Why does the HttpInvokerServiceExporter intercept Runtime Exception and returns them to the Client?
This leads server code, which deals which RuntimeExceptions...
There was an issue with cglib and non public methods.
It "simply" did'nt see them .... as an afterthought probably quite understandable.
So beware using cglib: "what you see is what you get" ;-)
This should work:
Server server = new Server();
SocketListener listener = new SocketListener();
listener.setPort(8080);
server.addListener(listener);...
This quite a general question ;-)
What are the Option's for Rich Internet Application Technologie specially used with the Springframework in a Servlet Container (Tomcat eg.)
And where could i...
Setting "proxyTargetClass" to "true", as Rob suggested, was the solution:
The reason for the NPE, was that the proxied method from the interface of the Bean Class, where final, so CGLIB could'nt...
The npe comes from jdbcTml being null.
jdbcTml is initialized in the constructor of the superclass:
protected static abstract class AbstractQuery {
/**
* Logger...
The stack trace:
[junit] org.springframework.jdbc.datasource.DataSourceTransactionManager - Using transaction object...
Great thanx Rob for your help.
The log4j console output of the junit run, with debug enabled is quite extensive (1386).
Shall i post it?
Christoph
Additional information to above:
I construct the JdbcTemplate with the datasource property the afterPropertiesSet Method of a Dao Bean and store it locally.
When i retrieve the JdbcTemplate in...
I updated the cglib to the newest version. That got me further.
But now i get a null pointer exception on the jdbcTemplate for the second invocation of a dao:
[junit]...
Hi Rob,
somehow the bean's don't load after setting the proxyTargetClass in the ProxyFactoryBean to true.
I get the following exception stack:
[junit] 1)...
That actually what i am doing. the factories are even Spring configured.
But i rejected setting the application context, because i did'nt want to introduce a additional dependency. for the sake...