Search:

Wow , that explains another of my issues. IMHO the expire-groups-upon-completion="true" should be the default. BTW I don't like the aggregator's new role of remembering such imprecise number of...

Thank you Gary.

https://jira.springsource.org/browse/INT-2832

One more question: with the new behavior, in order to discard such subsequent messages, the aggregator will have to store every...

Hello, some idea? What could be wrong?

BTW the documentation regarding the "release" is not clear enough (at least for me.) It starts with the "group released for aggregation", but the rest of...

Hello,

I'm getting a strange behavior with the aggregator with SI 2.1.4 as compared to SI 2.0.3. Reduced to a test case which just accumulates up to two messages before releasing:




public...

Thank you Gary.

https://jira.springsource.org/browse/INT-2510

Some idea for a workaround?

Hello, some idea? or I'm missing something?

Hello,

I'm using an Aggregator (using the default in memory storage) as a sort of temporary repository useful for the logic of my flow.

Now I need to establish different expiration times for...

I had the same problem but not in a SI scenario. A large text file that is transmitted to us via internet daily with scp (openssh server in our side.) The line is slow so there is a big chance of...

Ok Gary. I beg to differ about this not being a good practice. BTW, I'm integrating two systems that had a permanent link (before with X25, now with IP) and the link disconnection is an abnormal...

Hello,

I'm trying to establish a permanent connection using tcp-outbound-channel-adapter/tcp-inbound-channel-adapter (not a TCP gateway), but noted that after any message is sent, the connection...

Thank you Gary, comment added.

Hi,

I'd like to setup a TCP client (tcp-outbound-channel-adapter) connection with a fixed time retry policy, i.e., independently of having pending messages to be sent. What's the best way to do...

Done: https://jira.springsource.org/browse/INT-1959

Ok I've found that it was removed as suspected: http://forum.springsource.org/showthread.php?95053-Error-in-definition-of-default-taskScheduler&highlight=SimpleTaskScheduler

Yet I don't understand...

Hello,

I'm trying to understand the scheduling issues with SI. In appendix B3 reads:

"By default Spring Integration uses the SimpleTaskScheduler implementation. That in turn just delegates to...

it's working for me too... Awesome!

Thanks a lot for your help and patience Gary!

Yep, anyway tried the first suggestion with the same exception. Yet I didn't try extending the AbstractAggregatingMessageGroupProcessor.

For the other suggestion, I believe that the...

No, it doesn't. I want the aggregator to use the header present just in the request message (since the response doesn't have it.)



public boolean canRelease(List<Message<?>> list) {...

Hi again,

Following your advise I'm trying to implement it by using an <aggregator>. As far I can see the response is being correlated with the request and the ReleaseStrategy is correctly being...

Well, I'm not thinking about transmiting headers on the TCP channels (many legacy systems will not accept these at all.) I'm looking for a standard way to match (using my domain specific logic) a...

Thanks, but I think my requirement was not clearly specified.

I have an outbound tcp endpoint; the replies (if they come at all) will not be ordered, depending on the peer systems. I will create...

Hi, I'm having the same issue described here:

http://forum.springsource.org/showthread.php?57160-Asynchronous-request-reply-correlation

Apparently there is a workaround for JMS but in my case...

Thanks Christian, it is working now. I deleted the PAR; after setting those references (yet I don't understand them at all), and restarting Eclipse it is working.

regards,

Diego

Some suggestion?

Hello,

I'm using STS 2.3.2 and DM-server 2.0.1.

I have some bundles inside a PAR, targeted to the dm-server, and all runs ok.

But I don't want to use a PAR because I need to be able to...