Hi Gunnar
I have a couple of points around lifecycle and versioning of the SI Samples.
Firstly on versioning.. We have many projects using various versions of Spring Integration. The samples...
Type: Posts; User: ndw; Keyword(s):
Hi Gunnar
I have a couple of points around lifecycle and versioning of the SI Samples.
Firstly on versioning.. We have many projects using various versions of Spring Integration. The samples...
I have a requirement where on receipt of a JMS message I need to delete all the data from a table before repopulating with the data in the message. It's very important that the deletes occur first...
Thanks and apologies Oleg - my mistake. Combination of messed up settings and then browsing here:http://maven.springframework.org/milestone/org/springframework/integration/spring-integration/ and...
... I've looked in http://maven.springframework.org/milestone, http://maven.springframework.org/snapshot, http://maven.springframework.org/release and central.
I need to be able to set a com.jcraft.jsch.ProxySOCKS5 on the SFTP session used by the sftp:outboundChannel adapter.
I think I need to provide my own implementation of...
Thanks a lot - that worked perfectly. Not sure I'm going to use it in anger but it's certainly useful for prototyping.
I want to set some standard headers and the names of the headers are constants defined in code.
Is there any way I can use the header namespace support to use java field values as the values for...
Thanks Oleg
For example you mean JdbcMessageStoreChannelIntegrationTests ?
Any plans to make something like that pattern part of a spring-integration-test utility at some point?
I'm...
I want to test the behaviour of a pipeline fronted by a jdbc:inbound-channel-adapter
I want to test end to end - so I want to setup the database table, let the inbound-adapter process the data and...
I have several 'jobs' where i need to read data from n db tables and ouput to n files.
The only variants are the query and db properties and the output filenames.
This could be configured as a...
Raised INT-1909
Hi
Is there any way to disable the strictHostKeyChecking in the (JSCH), session used for SFTP?
If not - is there any reason why this couldn't/shouldn't be exposed?
Thanks Dave - Using the FieldSetFactory I can get different FieldSets from my tokenizer.
However I don't want to use the same FieldSetMapper - I want to create A or B or C objects by selecting...
Sorry if I wasn't clear.
My records are different and I thought I should capture that when I tokenize - they have same number of fields, but apart from the record type indicator, the fields...
Hi Dave - sorry for delayed response
Err ... no!
As I see it, I need to classify my line to select a Tokenizer (to create FieldSet A or B), and then select the correct FieldSetMapper to...
I have to process a file containing 2 different records. Records contain the same number of tokens and are distinguished by the value of field 10 - 'A' or 'B'
So I want to create different...
Thanks Dave. We've already got something that works for us (pre-SI2), so I'll stick with that for the time being. I'd prefer to have this supported out of the box though and have raised INT-1803
I have a number of situations where access to source or target is via stored procedures. Is it possible to use to the new jdbc components in these cases?
Raised INT-1755
Apologies - found it see the Tip in the RendezvousChannel section of the reference manual. An example might help but my mistake.
In the SI reference manual section on MessageStore it says
'An important use case for this is when the MessageStore is managing persistent queues backing a Spring Integration Message Channel.'
...
Thanks Dave. I started looking into your suggestions and came across GroupAwareJob. From the API doc it looks very much like my requirement - but in my case the 'group' is France rather than...
I have a single job definition - myJob. I run an instance of myJob with different parameters for different countries. This works fine but in the job repository when viewed in Spring Batch Admin I...
Thanks for responding to this. I've pretty much decided against doing it - I don't like the idea of holding open transactions started by inbound-adapterA-thread while inbound-adapterB-thread does...
Is a Synchronized DirectChannel a terrible idea?
The idea being that it forces single threaded execution of downstream handlers so that developers would not need to worry too much about writing...