Ad-(and dis-, if any)vantages of Spring AS compared to Swiz
Aloha,
I'm going to (re)build quite a large application using Flex/Spring.
For the main AS (/Flex) framework I was thinking of using Mate, Swiz, Spring AS or any combination.
Swiz and Spring AS seem very similar to me so I was wondering is somebody could explain me the differences a bit.
It seems to me that Swiz' development is a little bit ahead of Spring AS but I'm not sure if that is correct.
The only advantage of Spring AS I see is that it uses an external xml file which can be edited whithout recompiling. Though I love all Spring products and would be nice to have some more pro arguments for using it. :)
And would it make sense to combine Spring AS to Mate? It seems that they use a totally different strategy but maybe thet fit nicely together as witch all very flexible Spring modules.
I already read this nice comparison of frameworks but it's missing Spring AS:
http://www.insideria.com/2008/12/fra...ntroducti.html
Thanks in advance for the upcoming replies! :)
Jochen