volenin
Jan 25th, 2005, 03:58 PM
Hi,
I wonder where is a good place to submit 'feature requests'? (I know, ideally it's 'do it yourself and submit the code', but probably someone already implemented it?...) Very small thing for now: xml config file, <property> tag, be able to set "constant" value as an attribute for <property> tag, that is:
<property name="url" value="jdbc:xxxxx"/>
This should decrease file size significantly, especially if separate config file is not used.
Also, another feature: introduce 'JSTL'/"ANT" like variables. That is be able to reference properties set somewhere else in the file (not necessarity bound to beans):
<property name="APP_NAME" value="TEST/>
<beans>
<bean id="xxx"....>
<property name="applicationName" value="${APP_NAME}"/>
</bean>
</beans>
I created a poll as well... If this hasn't been done yet (in the upcoming version) and it's smth many people would want to see... well, what the heck - I might as well write this code (don't promise thought!!! :) )
I wonder where is a good place to submit 'feature requests'? (I know, ideally it's 'do it yourself and submit the code', but probably someone already implemented it?...) Very small thing for now: xml config file, <property> tag, be able to set "constant" value as an attribute for <property> tag, that is:
<property name="url" value="jdbc:xxxxx"/>
This should decrease file size significantly, especially if separate config file is not used.
Also, another feature: introduce 'JSTL'/"ANT" like variables. That is be able to reference properties set somewhere else in the file (not necessarity bound to beans):
<property name="APP_NAME" value="TEST/>
<beans>
<bean id="xxx"....>
<property name="applicationName" value="${APP_NAME}"/>
</bean>
</beans>
I created a poll as well... If this hasn't been done yet (in the upcoming version) and it's smth many people would want to see... well, what the heck - I might as well write this code (don't promise thought!!! :) )